Skip to content
Henri de GrossouvreEssayist on European geopolitics
03

Expertise

Bilateral strategic axes

France-Germany, France-Italy, Central Europe, the transatlantic link. He thinks not in territories but in connections between named points — and a connection, unlike a bloc, can be proved or disproved.

The argument

Henri de Grossouvre’s vocabulary gives him away: hinge, hub, pivot, axis, ferryman. These are words of connection. His mental geography is made not of blocs but of segments joining cities — and a segment, unlike a bloc, can be checked.

France-Germany: from conviction to clear sight

He began with the Franco-German pairing, and he believed in it. In 2003, as the Élysée Treaty approached its fortieth anniversary, he proposed using the moment to build a confederation. In 2005 he named Strasbourg and Alsace as the institutional and symbolic centre of a political relaunch, holding that treaty reform would not be enough: a Franco-German federation is the viable core.

Twenty years on, the tone has changed, and that is what makes the corpus interesting. In Revue Conflits, in March 2024, he describes a contradictory German strategy: public support for Ukraine — Patriot, Leopard — alongside discreetly maintained channels to Moscow. He argues that Berlin outsourced its energy to Russia, its security to the United States and part of its growth to China, and that the Zeitenwende owes more to economic calculation and to Zivilmacht than to geopolitical ambition. This is not a reversal; it is a reading that followed its object.

France-Italy: an argument older than its moment

In November 2021, in an interview with the Club Italie-France, he argued that France and Italy share more common interests in financial matters than either does with Germany and the northern countries, named space and transport as priority fields for cooperation, and stated that Rome remains the spiritual and cultural heart of Europe.

Five years before the Nice op-ed. That chronological detail matters: it establishes that the Paris-Rome axis is not a reaction to the news but a position built over time.

Central Europe, seen from Vienna

From 1998 to 2002 he ran Alcatel’s major accounts for Central Europe and Russia from Vienna. When he wrote about Serbia in 2015 and cast it as a hub between the European Union and Moscow, this was not desk analysis: it was the reading of someone who had worked the region before writing about it.

What the bilateral format offers

A bilateral axis has a property that neither blocs nor organisations have: it is falsifiable. One can measure whether the Quirinal Treaty produces effects, whether the Franco-German pairing holds, whether Serbia tips. That is probably why he keeps coming back to it.

Key facts
  • He lived four years in Vienna as Alcatel's director of major accounts for Central Europe and Russia: his reading of Central Europe is not second-hand.
  • His case for a Franco-Italian rapprochement was made in a 2021 interview, five years before the 2026 op-ed that brought it to notice.
  • On Germany, he wrote a head-on analysis in 2024: public support for Ukraine alongside discreetly maintained channels to Moscow.
6

Related publications

Op-ed7 August 2026

Nice: The Revival of a Key Strategic Role for France and Italy in Europe (opens in a new tab)

Le Cronache Lucane · Le Diplomate

The most recent argument: making Nice the pivot of a Paris-Rome axis. The author grounds the case in the city's long history — Greek foundation, Roman then Piedmontese inheritance, culturally Italian until the annexation of 1860 — and in the 2021 Quirinal Treaty, which he places, for the Franco-Italian pairing, where the Élysée Treaty stands for the Franco-German one. The partnership he describes is measured in capabilities: Mediterranean routes, defence industry, energy, digital infrastructure, capital. The text first appeared in Italian, in Le Cronache Lucane on 7 August 2026 — translated by Alessandro Sansoni — and then in French and English in Le Diplomate.

Article15 March 2024

War in Ukraine: Germany's Double Game (opens in a new tab)

Revue Conflits

The author argues that Germany pursues a contradictory strategy: public support for Ukraine — Patriot, Leopard — alongside discreetly maintained channels to Moscow. He contends that Berlin outsourced its energy to Russia, its security to the United States and part of its growth to China, and that the Zeitenwende owes more to economic calculation and to Zivilmacht than to geopolitical ambition.

Interview15 November 2021

Interview — France and Italy: More Common Ground Than Is Assumed (opens in a new tab)

Club Italie-France

An interview in which he argues that France and Italy share more common interests in financial matters than either does with Germany and the northern countries, and names space and transport as priority fields for cooperation. He states that Rome remains the spiritual and cultural heart of Europe. Five years before the Nice op-ed: the Paris-Rome argument is not a reaction to the news.

Op-ed29 January 2015

Serbia: New Hub Between EU Countries and Moscow (opens in a new tab)

Revue Défense Nationale, Tribune T606

Six pages on Serbia at a crossroads, after years of difficult relations with the European Union. The analysis casts the country as a hinge between the EU space and Moscow — ten years before the question returned to the centre of attention.

ArticleFebruary 2003

Revising the Élysée Treaty, Europe and Russia (opens in a new tab)

Revue Défense Nationale, n° 650

Written as the Élysée Treaty approached its fortieth anniversary. The author argues that France and Germany should use the revision to establish a confederation and jointly shape a European policy towards Russia, resting on shared economic, cultural and strategic interests.